"I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. [2]. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". Answer: Photographer. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". to someone you know: But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. We must shake off the "ugly, superstitious, backwater concept of God" we learned as children, chides JZ Knight--uh, Ramtha. logged you out. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. Q: You do see that in some science . Nasa found something. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. Dr Candice Pert We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. That's its claim anyway. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. subscription. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. That's why we experience a classical world. It's there. . The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. Real news, real hope. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. This website uses cookies to You can't just hope for the best. mixed truisms with conjecture, interviews and dramatic "recreations" of the ideas being discussed, to form a kind of cohesive supposition on the link between mind and matter, biology and the Big Bang. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. It is just a movie. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. for only $16.05 $11/page. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Amit Gotswami [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. It was an interesting idea aiming to solve the hierachy problem, as announced. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Prominent if you go by citations that is. It's certainly not. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. What the Bleep!? What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. In one experiment, people who were walking across a college campus were asked by a stranger for directions. What the Bleep Do We Know? There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. is god-awful. She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." . It's certainly not. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. And wait-the human body is mostly water! Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? The year's most unexpected indie hit in American cinemas - a film about quantum physics - is about to open here. 3. You can't change the world by thinking about it. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." It was really hard to sit through. (stylized as What t #$*! And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. 7. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. continue to use the site without a 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. Nobody does.". is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Q: But isn't everything really connected? https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? What was new? . Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. That's what makes the world so interesting. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". 1. They want suggestions, not formulas. The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). Joe Dispenza 1. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. They don't go anywhere, Fred. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. is released on Friday. They were spreading their methods of meditation but that was not the main thing that impressed me. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force.
Can You Pass Smog With Aftermarket Exhaust In California?, Darlington County School District Staff Directory, Vilano Beach Fishing Report, Articles W